英语辩论总结陈词【1】
China should not abolish the school-choosing fee
Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, I am the leader of the opposition.
Our opinion is that China should not abolish the school-choosing fee.
In the first place we would like to make clear that different countries have different national conditions.
We can’t go by the case of other countries.
So In terms of our condition, we suppose that China should not abolish the school-choosing fee.
There is always a huge controversy since school-choosing fee has emerged.
Therefore, we should analyze the reason in all directions in order to reach the right conclusions.
School Choice fee is the fee that the students who don’t want to go the school delineated by the Department of Education pay for the school.
Furthermore, the school choosing fee is students pay for their selection under pressure of the competition in society.
This is a joint result.
Before the statement of reasons, we must distinguish between school choice and the choice fees distinction, the rules of the school choosing is a system for students and parents choose better schools .
the school-choosing fee is the cost of students and parents select for their preferable school.
School Choosing fee is not equal to the rules of school-choosing .
They have different means.
Today we mainly talk about the school-choosing fee.
To bear out our opinion, we have three reasons:
Firstly: At this stage, school choosing fee is reasonable.
School Choosing fee is a two-way selection of schools and students.
The causes of school-choosing fee emerge is: school is lack for funding and the school must pay more for the normal operation of schools and maintain the development.
Students wants to enjoy special treatment and this treatment also has the scarcity situation.
The school-choosing fee will also ease some extent of excessive pursuit for hot schools.
In the school choosing system, such a sacrifice for others is more fair and reasonable .
Under the pressure of insufficient funding for education, the school choosing fee charged is clearly necessary and reasonable.
Deputy Minister of Education Zhang Baoqing said, since 1998, the number of college students in a net increase of 10 million.
According the costs calculated by the Ministry of Education, with each undergraduate students addition, the funding must be invested in infrastructure construction for 5 million.
In this standard, the state investment will increase more than 500 billion than in 1998.
Now the country has reached 100 billion college loans, but there is still a huge nick of funding.
If the school don’t have enough in the future, higher education will be difficult to be maintained.
Secondly: At this stage, the abolition of school-choosing fee can not solve the existing educational problems.
The reason of fanatical pursuit the school choosing is the contradiction between the strongly pursuit of the high quality education resource and the lack of the high quality education resource.
According of the result of investigate in 2011, the total number of junior high school students in Hangzhou City is 22,734 and the total number of private school students is 3,800.
The number of private schools thought as high quality are less than 2,000.
That means only 8.
8% of primary school graduates have opportunities to enter these private schools.
Faced with this situation, abolishing the school choosing fee won’t make this 8.
8% increase? Suppose the school-choosing fee abolished and replaced by the rules of studying in the nearest school only.
However, the uneven distribution of educational resources will cause the status of new conflicts.
Students will find other ways to seize the high-quality educational resources.
Since the establishment of compulsory education system in the West, the free public schools and the expensive private schools are co-exist.
Parents can chose either the public or private schools.
U.S.public schools have formulated the "dicing enrollment, the nearest school" policy - no matter where you move.
As long as there fixed abode, can you go to the local school district committee for their children to go to school.
Any public school within the school district couldn’t rejected by any reason.
But children can not choose schools outside the school district.
Such a provision makes so many American families have to relocate for better school.
In this way of school choosing, the burden on parents is no less than Chinese.
Last but not least: At this stage, the abolition of school choosing fee is not feasible.
Contradictions in Chinese society is complex, the reform of the education system may have uncertain affection.
The cancellation is related to all of the Chinese university, senior high school , middle school ,primary school, even kindergartens.
Facing with the shortage and the uneven distribution of educational resources, how could you simply break the chain and put aside those benefit the school? How could you simply restrain the warm desire to the better schools? How could you ignore the reality of Chinese education falling behind?
In Objective, there are still many problems with School choosing fee.
But we must recognize that the abolition will bring more problems at this stage.
It’s not reasonable to use a way with more defection to replace the way in exist.
The cancellation of School Choosing needs to be fully considered as a matter of timing, the reform can not be accomplished overnight.
Therefore, we believe that China should not abolish the school-choosing fee.
英文辩论赛 debate 三辩总结陈词【2】
Well, my honorable judges, dear fellow debaters, after your conclusion, I can get your point.
Firstly, you said education is learning experience of our predecessors.
Second, you said the more education you have, the more likely you will succeed.
And last, you said the more education you have, the better you will appreciate our life.
Yes, we agree that.
But all the evidences you presented are not adequate to prove that why education is more important than work experience.
We believe that work experience is more important than education.
First of all, you need experience to get a job, and you need a job to get experience.
Both education and experience are very important in finding a job, but experience is what the majority of employers want.
Just observe many of the job or career ads; you can see that they all emphasize 3 to 4 years experience in the particular field.
Also, most employers prefer experience over education.
The only time the employers look at education is only in the filed of education, nothing else.
We all learn by doing things.
We don’t think higher education you have, the more likely you will succeed.
Success is a complicated integration.
Education is only one of the factors.
Lots of facts have been proved that one can be succeed in many ways.
Second, education does not prepare you for real-world challenges.
Even though you can get high grades in paper exams, those numbers can not make you living better in real life.
How many high-mark students do not know how to cook, millions? billions? I don't know.
But I know such numbers is million, even billion times of those grades.
Higher education is absolutely not the guarantee of high ability, not to mention high pay.
We don’t think higher education means high pay; we just know the fact that the more education you have, the more bills you will pay.
Last but not the least; education will finally end in one's life .
Ironically the work experience would never end as long as one is willing to work.
Every one needs to work, that is the most significant thing in our life.
We get experience by doing things, and it's those experience that get you ahead faster.
We don’t think higher education.
We don’t think the more education you have, the better you will appreciate our life.
Life is just like a box of chocolate, you don’t know what you are going to get.
Every one has his own way to make life meaningful, and every one has his own way to appreciate his life, we can whose is better, whose is not.
So we conclude that work experience is more important than education.